|
Senator
Hutchison's Principled Stand
Legal
background compels Senate's highest-ranking
woman to push for LSC increase
Early
last summer, as congressional leaders were emphasizing the
importance of fiscal austerity in order to fund important
homeland security and anti-terrorism priorities, a Senate
majority wrote to request additional funding to address a
domestic issue they could no longer ignore.
“Additional
funds are clearly needed to see that the doors of justice are
open to those in society who are unable to afford access to the
legal system,” wrote a bipartisan coalition of 52 Senators in
a June 17 letter to the leaders of the Senate Appropriations
Committee. These Senators went on the record in support of a
four percent, or $13.6 million, funding increase for the
national legal services program. Their letter concluded,
“Clearly, large numbers of Americans do not have access to the
legal representation they need. Without this modest increase in
federal funding, many more will be denied fair representation.
We urge you to fund the Legal Services Corporation at no less
than $352.4 million to help meet this urgent need.”
In
the end, fiscal discipline ruled the day and no increase was
approved. However, the letter was a clear indication of the
bipartisan support that now exists for an active federal role in
ensuring access to justice for low-income Americans.
Indeed,
among the GOP signatories of the letter were both of the
Senators from Texas, Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn, two
leaders whose conservative credentials are beyond question.
Their endorsement of LSC is the latest indication that support
for legal services has begun to transcend party affiliation and
political orientation.
“Senator
Cornyn and I are lawyers,” Senator Hutchison says. “We have
had experience with the importance of providing access to
justice. It was instilled in us in law school and beyond that we
had a responsibility to make a contribution.”
The
Texas Senators’ backing of an LSC funding increase can be
traced back to 1995 and 1996, when Congress enacted a series of
congressional reforms redefining what LSC-funded lawyers could
and could not do. As a result, LSC stopped filing class action
lawsuits, representing prisoners and most aliens, engaging in
lobbying activities, collecting attorney’s fees, and filing
suits dealing with controversial issues like abortion and
political redistricting. Instead, LSC instructed its grantees to
focus exclusively on helping individual clients with critical,
day-to-day legal problems.
“The
Legal Services Corporation has done some very good things in the
last 10 years,” Senator Hutchison says. “Its leaders have
really gotten better at determining what the proper role for
legal services ought to be—and then doing the outreach to make
sure they reach the people who need their services. Without the
reforms, Legal Services would not have gotten the bipartisan
support it has and perhaps would have faced some reprisals in
Congress.”
Senator
Cornyn says LSC’s willingness to build a consensus agenda was
critical to gaining his support upon taking office in 2002. A
former Texas Supreme Court Justice and state Attorney General,
he already had a track record of intervening on behalf of legal
aid programs committed to carrying out their core functions.
While Attorney General, Cornyn steered $5 million from the
state’s Crime Victims Compensation Fund to Texas legal
services programs so they could better assist victims of
domestic violence—an unprecedented use of the Fund.
| "The
President is trying to bring the deficit down, and we
have to look at every program carefully, I think the
Legal Services Corporation will come out well in that
kind of scrutiny. The more we show how successful it is
in helping people who don't have the capability to help
themselves, the more of a priority we can make it." |
“There
is broad public consensus supporting the provision of legal
assistance to people who are victims of crime and domestic
violence,” Cornyn notes. “I think it is very smart to build
a consensus agenda and leave out the controversial things
because they undermine that important bipartisan support. Given
the overwhelming need, I’m glad to see the focus is on core
legal services.”
Hutchison
has been fully cognizant of the Legal Services Corporation’s
value to low-income families ever since she was approached by
the Texas Bar Association not long after her historic
swearing-in as Texas’ first female Senator in 1994. She
credits the Bar for making a passionate and persuasive case that
LSC assistance was critical to low-income Texans who had no
other way to obtain essential legal advice and assistance. The
Bar’s outreach reinforced her own positive experiences helping
low-income clients as a student in the clinical program of the
University of Texas School of Law and later as a private
attorney doing indigent defense work.
Hutchison
was re-elected to the Senate in a landslide in 2000, and then
was elected Vice Chairman of the Republican Conference, making
her the highest-ranking woman in the Senate. Today, she
continues to find compelling new reasons to champion legal
services. “They’re helping people from military families,”
she notes. “We particularly need to make sure we are helping
the lower-income members of the military who might not have
another way to get a lawyer.”
Hutchison’s
continued support is especially important because she sits on
the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee with funding authority
over LSC. The key funding panel has a brand-new Chairman in
Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL), and Hutchison promises that “I
will be one of the advocates of LSC talking to him about the
important role that it plays in fulfilling a need that must be
filled. If we don’t fill it, then people will not have access
to courts and the representation that everyone deserves.”
This
spring, leaders of the American Bar Association will hold a
number of meetings on the Hill with key appropriators like
Senators Shelby and Hutchison to make the case for LSC’s FY06
budget request of $363.8 million, a $33 million increase over
FY05. Hutchison appears cautiously optimistic about LSC’s
prospects in what will be “a tough budget year, for sure,”
she says. “The President is trying to bring the deficit down,
and we have to look at every program carefully. I think the
Legal Services Corporation will come out well in that kind of
scrutiny. The more we show how successful it is in helping
people who don’t have the capability to help themselves, the
more of a priority we can make it. I will certainly lean toward
supporting the higher figure and be supportive to the extent
that I possibly can.”
|